Editor’s note: Welcome to another installment of our weekly War Books series! The premise is simple and straightforward. We ask an expert on a particular topic to recommend books on that topic and tell us what sets each one apart. War Books is a resource for MWI readers who want to learn more about important subjects related to modern war and are looking for books to add to their reading lists.
This week’s Installment comes from Michael Hennelly, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and former West Point professor. He lists seven books that directly or indirectly explore themes of leadership and explains why they warrant a place on your summer reading list.
Master and Commander to Blue at the Mizzen, by Patrick O’Brian
Twenty books that are a joy to read. They can be read for the sheer delight of immersing in exciting and well-written books or they can be read to explore at a granular level the various steps (and missteps) of Jack Aubrey’s leadership journey. If there were any justice in the world, Hollywood would make more than one movie from this series.
Clausewitz, by Sir Michael Howard
Slogging through 125 chapters of On War is probably not the best way to be introduced to Clausewitz. The alternative is to read Sir Michael Howard’s delightful and short (seventy-three pages!) book, which was published as part of the Oxford University Press Past Masters series.
The Innovator’s Dilemma, by Clayton Christensen
Soldiers rarely (if ever) turn to books written by management scholars for insights into strategy. Army chief of staff reading lists famously ignore books written by business school professors. But Christensen provides a fascinating insight into one of the most fundamental strategic challenges facing any army—how to effectively respond to a rapidly changing world.
A Place of Greater Safety, by Hilary Mantel
Long before she became famous with the publication of Wolf Hall Mantel gave us an elegantly written and intricately plotted portrait of a society undergoing revolutionary change. Seen through the eyes of three French revolutionaries—Danton, Robespierre, and Desmoulins—we are confronted with the existential challenges faced by leaders in chaotic and dynamic social circumstances.
Hell in a Very Small Place, by Bernard Fall
One of the most intriguing questions of military history is “How could the French have lost at Dien Bien Phu?” Bernard Fall, one of the most influential writers on the Indochina Wars, provides a riveting account of the actions taken by French strategic and tactical leaders that led to this national catastrophe.
George C. Marshall: Education of a General, 1880–1939, by Forrest Pogue
Although Pogue eventually provided a four-volume biography, the first volume of Marshall’s life is especially inspiring to any leader. Omar Bradley once said that Marshall was his ideal of an officer and, after reading Pogue’s biography, we know why. In an Army that only valued seniority, Marshall spent decades consciously and effectively preparing himself to excel at the challenge of command.
Lee’s Lieutenants, by Douglas Southall Freeman
Many of America’s wars have been “come as you are” affairs so it is interesting to consider the example of an army that was rapidly built from scratch and immediately thrown into mortal combat. Most people will not want to read all three volumes of Lee’s Lieutenants but luckily, Stephen Sears has provided a one-volume abridgment. Forty-seven soldiers served under Lee as major generals and 146 soldiers served under him as brigadier generals. Using a leadership canvas of this size, Freeman provides an astonishingly vivid array of insights into some of the most fundamental aspects of leadership.
Michael Hennelly served twenty-one years as a field artillery officer and foreign area officer in the US Army. He taught international relations In West Point’s Department of Social Sciences as an active duty officer and later served as a civilian professor in the Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership. He holds a doctorate in strategic management and has taught strategy to executive MBA students at three universities.
The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
Image credit: Lara Poirrier, US Army
Although only an article and not a book, the following article — entitled "Civilizationism and the Ideological Contestation of the Liberal International Order," by Gregorio Bettiza, Derek Bolton, and David Lewis (which can be found at "International Studies Review," Volume 25, Issue 2, June 2023) might also make interesting summer reading. Here are a couple of excerpts from this such article:
"In short, the notion that we live in an international system shaped by the internal dynamics and external relations of a plurality of civilizations colors multiple facets of world politics today. As Amitav Acharya (2020, 139) argues, ““Civilization” is back at the forefront of global policy debates” (see also Katzenstein 2010a; Bettiza 2014; Coker 2019; Hale and Laruelle 2021). This article asks, how should we make sense of the surge in civilizational politics at this historical juncture? We argue that the growing political salience of civilizational discourses and practices is best understood as an ideological reaction to and contestation of the liberal international order, particularly in the context of its globalization since the end of the Cold War. We call this ideology, borrowing from Rogers Brubaker (2017), civilizationism." …
"Yet, as noted by scholars across different theoretical traditions, the liberal international order is not simply a normatively thin order that regulates in mutually beneficial ways relations among states through value-free rules, institutions, and markets. It is rather an ideologically thick order (Allan, Vucetic, and Hopf 2018; Jahn 2019; Cooley and Nexon 2020), infused with a complex set of ideas, norms and principles, whose main institutions, actors, and practices seek to transform states and their societies both beyond and within the West."
As to the information and issues raised in this article, consider whether:
a. Re: such things as our worldwide/both at home and abroad "human rights" initiatives (such as "diversity, equity and inclusion"?) — which we seem to have undertaken in name of the "transformative" goals and requirements of the liberal internal order — whether we are now clashing badly with the less-DEI/the non-DEI characteristics of "cultures" both here at home and there abroad. And whether:
b. Such nations as China — by embracing such things as "culturalism" instead of "human rights" — are seeking to gain greater power, influence and control throughout the world due to this such clash. (In this regard, look up and consider such things as China's new "Global Civilization Initiative.")