The Road to Multi-Domain Battle: An Origin Story
Editor’s note: “Multi-Domain Battle” made its first appearance in Army doctrine with the release...
Read MoreSelect Page
Kelly McCoy | 10.27.17 | Commentary & Analysis
Editor’s note: “Multi-Domain Battle” made its first appearance in Army doctrine with the release...
Read MoreMichael C. Davies | 05.11.17 | Commentary & Analysis
Multi-Domain Battle (MDB) has become the flavor of the month. Pushed predominantly by the US Army...
Read MoreA.J. Shattuck | 04.28.17 | Commentary & Analysis
The strategic challenges posed by resurgent global powers have largely escaped the headlines of...
Read MoreA.J. Shattuck | 03.28.17 | Commentary & Analysis
Operationalizing the multi-domain battle concept effectively will require significant changes to the Department of Defense that would likely constitute a second Goldwater-Nichols-style piece of legislation, altering the structure and operations of the defense community. As politically unlikely as it is to be implemented, that shouldn’t stop us from trying.
Read MoreChristopher Lee | 09.18.24 | Commentary & Analysis
Integrated deterrence—this is the concept at the core of US strategy in the Indo-Pacific. By...
Read MoreThe articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content.