Mission Command: Addressing the cause and effect of leadership challenges
Major Paul Lushenko argues the need for integration of the mission command leadership philosophy by continuing to emphasize leader development.
Read MoreSelect Page
Paul Lushenko | 03.07.16
Major Paul Lushenko argues the need for integration of the mission command leadership philosophy by continuing to emphasize leader development.
Read MoreCarl Forsling | 05.07.14
As military leaders, we like to believe that we have a core set of values, beliefs, and leadership practices that transcend the day-to-day workings of society. Our services have slogans such as “Semper Fidelis,” “This We’ll Defend,” or “Honor, Courage, Commitment.” Some even joke that we have over two centuries of tradition unhindered by progress. That isn’t true. We are a product of the society from which we are drawn, for better or worse.
The military takes American society and amplifies it. Usually, this is a good thing. Today, in one important way, it’s not.
Information is the modern world’s stock in trade. It’s often said that we’re moving towards an information-based economy, even an information-based society. Cell phones, e-mail, satellite communication, and the like have changed our lives.
The overloading effect of information has been picked to death. In this sense, the military is only a reflection of society. Every office worker in America hates his e-mail inbox, as do most military leaders, both enlisted and officer.
Read MoreM. L. Cavanaugh | 04.30.14
Image courtesy of Wikipedia. An Interesting comment from reader Michael Krogh worth considering – in response to the recent short essay, “Mission Command is Not Enough.” “But isn’t Mission Command...
Read MoreM. L. Cavanaugh | 04.24.14
Note: Departing for Gettysburg Historical Staff Ride, so this is coming a day early.
No West Point cadet will attend academic classes today due to the Simon Center for the Professional Military Ethic’s “Mission Command Conference.” “Mission command” is a fairly massive initiative in the Army, defined as “the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations.” In short, this is how the Army educates and inspires junior officers to take the initiative when on mission (avoiding constant need for supervision and guidance). This is both useful and critical on today’s battlefield.
Yet mission command is inherently constrained by the word, “mission.” The US Army doesn’t fight missions, it fights wars. Missions are designed to support war efforts, therefore, thinking about how one’s mission fits into the war’s context is not just helpful, but necessary. War is about much more than the tactical fight.
Read MoreThe articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content.
Major General (Retired) Mick Ryan, Australian Army
24 April 2025
2025 Sandhurst Conference
28 April 2025