War in 2050: The Army’s Operating Concept After Next
The Army, arguably too often, wraps ideas in layers of buzzwords, jargon that must be navigated to...
Read MoreSelect Page
Kevin Benson and James K. Greer | 05.01.23 | Commentary & Analysis
The Army, arguably too often, wraps ideas in layers of buzzwords, jargon that must be navigated to...
Read MoreKatherine Kjellström Elgin | 04.21.23 | War Books
Editor’s note: Welcome to another installment of our weekly War Books series! The premise is...
Read MoreSean Parrott and Anthony Perez | 03.31.23 | Commentary & Analysis
In a battlefield that is becoming increasingly saturated with multi-domain sensors, the US...
Read MoreLiam Collins | 03.17.23 | Commentary & Analysis
Earlier this week, two Russian Su-27 fighter aircraft downed a United States MQ-9 Reaper that was...
Read MoreBenjamin Jebb and Adam Darnley-Stuart | 03.10.23 | Irregular Warfare Podcast
As the character of warfare changes, emerging technologies are influencing the direction—and the...
Read MoreThe articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content.