Military Writing Takes Many Forms
Dan Sukman and Nate Finney provide thoughts on the many forms of written communication essential for military staff officers to communicate their ideas and concepts.
Read MoreSelect Page
Dan Sukman and Nathan K. Finney | 09.07.16 | Commentary & Analysis
Dan Sukman and Nate Finney provide thoughts on the many forms of written communication essential for military staff officers to communicate their ideas and concepts.
Read MoreDan Sukman | 06.29.16 | War Books
Major Dan Sukman, a strategist at the Army Capabilities Integration Center shares his top five books on warfare.
Read MoreDan Sukman | 01.05.15 | Commentary & Analysis
Image courtesy of Activity Mom. By Major Dan Sukman “In 50 years you’re gonna start doin’ some thinkin’ on your own and you’re going to come up with the fact that there are two certainties in life: one,...
Read MoreDan Sukman | 07.14.14 | Commentary & Analysis
With the proliferation of modern technology, and the rise of social media sites such as youtube, facebook, instagram and twitter, Soldiers on the modern battlefield will find themselves operating in a persistent information environment. Essentially, every action on the battlefield has a probability of reaching audiences across the globe in a matter of seconds. The effects of a persistent operating environment are profound; they will change how both our adversaries operate and how the U.S. joint force operates.
Adversaries will take advantage of the persistent operating environment by leveraging “big data” to eliminate any possibility of strategic surprise the United States seeks to gain in movement of forces across the globe. Adversaries will have the capability to link together a wide variety of remote sensing capabilities and develop a much more robust ability for early detection, identification and tracking of U.S. forces. In essence, adversaries will have the capacity to conduct real-time monitoring and reporting of joint force movements. Historical advantages of stealth and initiative employed by U.S. commanders will be increasingly difficult to attain.
Read MoreDan Sukman | 01.23.14 | Commentary & Analysis
Over the past decade, it has been wildly accepted that adversaries of the United States will adapt and develop Anti-Access and Area Denial (A2/AD) systems to keep the United States from projecting military power. Although recent U.S. military concepts have addressed the A2/AD threat, they have focused on what opposing military forces will bring to the fight. In turn, U.S. military concept writers have focused on systems that can defeat adversary A2/AD or operate outside the range of A2/AD. This is all well and good, but ignores how our adversaries have adapted to keep the U.S. from projecting military power.
Read MoreThe articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.
The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content.